Choose agency support when operations are the gap
If onboarding, appeals, or optimization are weak internally, structured support is often worth the process cost.
Home
Open the home overview.
Agency account overview
Model, fit, and onboarding at a glance.
Talk to our AM
Use contact when the issue needs more context first.
Facebook agency ad account
Meta setup, ownership rules, and support scope.
Google Ads agency account
MCC setup, verification context, and operating fit.
TikTok agency account
Qualification, onboarding, and support for TikTok Ads.
Management and appeals support
Resolve restrictions and run daily operations.
Optimization and reporting
Improve performance with clear reporting cadence.
Customer-owned model
Who owns what, and who controls access.
Eligibility and compliance
Who we support, and when we decline.
How onboarding works
Steps, documents, handoff, and timing.
Payment and funding
Published payment methods and fee notes.
Support and escalation
Support scope and escalation boundaries.
Resource guides
Open a guide and route to the right next step.
Evaluate providers
Use buyer-safe criteria before onboarding.
Questions before onboarding
Ask these due-diligence questions first.
Google Ads audit checklist
Review structure, billing, and policy signals.
TikTok payment troubleshooting
Fix payment failures and map escalation.
Get quote
Share platform, market, and support context for fit review.
Privacy policy
See how data is used and protected.
Terms of service
Review service boundaries and responsibilities.
No matching page yet. Try “trust”, “quote”, or “resources”.
Compare your options
The real question is not which model sounds better. It is which model fits how your team actually operates.
Use this guide to compare ownership, support load, onboarding friction, and operational control.

Decision lens
Ownership model
Customer-owned model with explicit boundaries reviewed during onboarding.
Onboarding friction
More upfront alignment on fit, documentation, ownership, and support.
Support coverage
Operating support can cover onboarding, management, appeals, optimization, and reporting.
Comparison matrix
Neither model is universally better. Match the model to your operational reality.
| Criteria | Agency account support model | Self-managed account model |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership model | Customer-owned model with explicit boundaries reviewed during onboarding. | Direct ownership and operations stay fully internal. |
| Onboarding friction | More upfront alignment on fit, documentation, ownership, and support. | Setup can feel faster, but internal burden is higher. |
| Support coverage | Operating support can cover onboarding, management, appeals, optimization, and reporting. | The team carries this burden internally or across multiple vendors. |
| Control and visibility | Control is clear when ownership, access, funding, and reporting are explicit. | Control can be strong, but edge-case handling stays in-house. |
| Best fit | Teams that need structured support and can follow qualification discipline. | Teams with mature internal operations and enough execution capacity. |
Decision framing
If onboarding, appeals, or optimization are weak internally, structured support is often worth the process cost.
If governance and execution are stable, partner overhead may not be necessary.
Light setup can become expensive when internal teams absorb verification and issue recovery.
FAQ
Short answers to common questions that come up during provider evaluation.
No. The guide is designed to help buyers compare trade-offs, not to force every reader into the same conclusion.
Because those are the criteria competitors usually under-explain, and they are exactly where serious buyers face risk later.
Read the customer-owned model page and the onboarding page, then compare those process demands against your internal operating capacity.